Insurance Coverage Disputes Over Prosthetic Legs Affect Children in Tennessee
Reading Time: 5 minutes
___
Summary:
-
Tennessee children with limb loss are being denied activity prosthetics by insurers
-
Insurance companies typically cover only basic legs, citing lack of medical necessity
-
The Jordan Thomas Foundation fills the gap, but argues insurers should bear the cost
-
A bill requiring coverage of activity limbs for amputees under 21 has cleared House and Senate committees
___
Alex Morgan loves to dance. She loves hiking trails and tennis. And she has the kind of smile that fills a room.
She also lost her leg five years ago to a rare bone disease. And for a time, the insurance company covering her care made it clear they weren’t interested in helping her do much more than go to the bathroom and walk to class.
Alex is at the center of a developing struggle in Tennessee over what health insurers owe child amputees and whether a prosthetic leg that merely keeps a kid upright is enough, or whether insurance should cover devices that let children actually be children. That struggle has now moved to the state Capitol, where the bill is gaining real momentum.
A Prosthetic Leg That Didn’t Work
When Alex’s first prosthetic arrived, her family had no experience to draw from. They didn’t know what a good prosthesis should feel like, how it should fit, or what it should enable her to do. What they soon realized was that it didn’t work.
Her mother, Anna Morgan, told Fox17 that her daughter could barely tolerate the prosthetic, wearing it no more than 20 minutes at a time.
Anna called the insurance company, hoping for answers. What she got instead was a response she says she’ll never forget.
She said she was told they weren’t concerned about Alex’s ability to be active—only that she could get herself to the bathroom or walk to class. The message, as Anna heard it, was that being unable to move like a typical child simply did not matter to them. She described it as a painful thing for a parent to be told.
The device Alex needed—an activity-specific prosthesis, also called an activity limb—would eventually allow her to dance, hike, and play tennis. But it didn’t come from her insurer. It came from the Jordan Thomas Foundation, a Nashville-based nonprofit that steps in when insurance won’t.
The Gap Between Basic and Functional
In Tennessee and across much of the country, insurance companies typically cover what they consider “medically necessary” prosthetics—functional enough to stand and walk, but often not much more. Activity limbs, designed to allow amputees to run, climb, play sports, and engage in the physical routines of everyday life, are frequently denied as unnecessary extras.
For children, advocates say, that distinction is devastating.
Jordan Thomas, founder of the eponymous foundation, told Fox17 that many amputees need more than one device—that activity limbs are often the only way they can pursue the things that matter to them. Insurance companies, he said, often dismiss these as medically unnecessary.
Thomas knows the stakes personally. He lost both legs in a boating accident and has since dedicated himself to fighting for broader prosthetic coverage. His foundation helps fill the gap left by insurers, but he’s clear that this shouldn’t be a charity problem.
Thomas argued that the core problem is insurers failing to cover prosthetics at the level patients actually need. He pointed out that a conflict of interest exists when those who decide what is medically necessary also have a financial interest in the outcome.
Gaining Ground at the Capitol
That argument appears to be resonating with lawmakers. The bill, which would require insurers to cover activity-specific prosthetics for amputees 21 years old and younger, has now cleared multiple legislative hurdles.
It passed a state House committee, with the Jordan Thomas Foundation continuing to champion the plan against resistance from insurance companies. Around the same time, the Senate Commerce Committee unanimously approved the legislation, after families of child amputees shared powerful testimonies in support.
As advocates continue to push for more comprehensive coverage, some insurers have proposed covering one basic leg per year. To this, supporters of the bill argue that one basic leg per year falls well short of what a growing, active child actually needs.
More Than a Medical Question
Supporters of the legislation argue that the debate over activity limbs boils down to a question about what kind of lives society believes disabled children deserve to live.
Without an activity prosthesis, there would be no dance recitals for Alex. No hiking trips. No tennis matches. None of the ordinary childhood moments that children need to grow.
Thomas framed the issue as one with long-term consequences. He said the question is whether Tennessee wants its young amputees to grow into adults who can work, raise families, and live fully. And the answer to that question has to start today.
For Alex and the families who testified before lawmakers, the answer is obvious. Whether Tennessee’s full legislature agrees is the next question, and the answer may be coming soon.
Related Reading:
Insurance Denied Her Prosthetic; She Fought to Walk at Graduation
