The Battle for Mobility: Insurance Denials and Prosthetic Access
Reading Time: 3 minutes
Insurance companies are increasingly refusing to provide coverage for prosthetic limbs, which leaves many individuals with limb loss without access to essential medical devices. This situation has garnered significant attention, as it has considerably affected those who depend on prosthetics for their everyday lives.
Currently, around 2.3 million Americans are living with limb loss, and this figure is expected to nearly double by 2050, as reported by the Government Accountability Office. This means that access to prosthetic devices needs to be improved. Despite the progress in prosthetic technology, it’s unfortunate that many individuals still face obstacles in securing insurance coverage for these vital devices.
Insurance denials and their justifications
Insurance companies often deny coverage for prosthetic limbs by labeling them as “not medically necessary” or “experimental,” even when prescribed by medical professionals. More often than not, these advanced prosthetics, such as microprocessor-controlled knees, have been in use for three decades and offer significant benefits, including reduced risk of falls and improved mobility. However, insurers may still categorize them as non-essential, leading to coverage denials.
For instance, Michael Adams from Colorado was denied a replacement for his microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee, despite its proven benefits and a prescription from his doctor. He shared with KFF Health News that his insurer deemed the device not medically necessary, highlighting the disconnect between medical recommendations and insurance policies.
Disparities in coverage
Public insurance programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, generally provide more consistent coverage for prosthetics. In contrast, private insurance coverage varies widely, with some plans offering comprehensive benefits while others impose strict limitations. This inconsistency often leaves individuals with private insurance facing significant out-of-pocket costs or going without necessary devices.
Approximately half of U.S. states have enacted “insurance fairness” laws requiring private insurers to cover prosthetic limbs at parity with other medical services. However, these laws typically apply only to state-regulated insurance plans, leaving many individuals in federally regulated plans without similar protections.
The human impact
The denial of prosthetic coverage has profound effects on individuals’ lives. Leah Kaplan, from Spokane, Washington, shared her experience with PBS News. She has received repeated denial letters from her insurer, which classified her prosthetic arm as a luxury item. However, such classifications overlook the essential role that prosthetics play in enabling individuals to perform daily activities, such as work, and regain their independence.
Meanwhile, in the same PBS News interview, Randy Glisson from Charlotte, North Carolina, shared that he received a letter saying that he doesn’t “do anything that requires two hands.”
These denials not only hinder physical mobility but also affect mental health and social participation. Without access to suitable prosthetic devices, individuals may experience decreased quality of life and increased isolation.
Advocacy and policy efforts
Advocates are pushing for federal legislation to mandate comprehensive prosthetic coverage across all insurance plans. While some progress has been made at the state level, a nationwide policy is necessary to ensure equitable access to prosthetic devices for all individuals, regardless of their insurance provider.
Efforts also include raising awareness about the importance of prosthetic coverage and challenging the classification of advanced prosthetics as non-essential.
The bottom line
The denial of insurance coverage for prosthetic limbs presents significant challenges for individuals who rely on these devices for mobility and independence. Addressing these issues requires concerted efforts from policymakers, insurers, and advocates to ensure that prosthetic devices are recognized as essential medical equipment and are accessible to all who need them.
